{
  "title": "Two existing domain statements and the verification they still require",
  "article": "https://synxcrypto.com/which-cryptocurrencies-quantum-resistant-from-genesis#comparison-table",
  "reviewed": "2026-09-21",
  "scope": "Editorial reference table; not a SYNX laboratory measurement. Preserve qualifiers in each row.",
  "columns": [
    "Network",
    "Existing statement",
    "Cryptographic scope named",
    "Historical verification needed"
  ],
  "rows": [
    [
      "SYNX / SynergyX",
      "Its whitepaper says post-quantum primitives have been used from genesis.",
      "SPHINCS+-SHAKE-128s signatures; Kyber-768 key encapsulation.",
      "Original and later verification rules, release identity and fallback/recovery paths."
    ],
    [
      "QRL",
      "This site’s market comparison marks XMSS as from genesis.",
      "XMSS hash-based transaction signatures.",
      "Original and later consensus rules, signature-state handling and the exact native network."
    ]
  ],
  "sources": [
    {
      "url": "https://synxcrypto.com/whitepaper.php",
      "label": "SYNX whitepaper: project-stated genesis design and signature/KEM roles"
    },
    {
      "url": "https://synxcrypto.com/articles/103-synx-price-analysis-2026-2030.php",
      "label": "Existing domain comparison: QRL/XMSS from-genesis classification only"
    },
    {
      "url": "https://csrc.nist.gov/pubs/fips/205/final",
      "label": "NIST FIPS 205: stateless hash-based digital signature standard"
    }
  ]
}