SPHINCS+ Signatures Explained: Hash-Based Security
SPHINCS+ (now SLH-DSA under FIPS 205) provides digital signatures for the SynX quantum-resistant wallet. This stateless hash-based scheme offers the strongest quantum resistance confidence.
Why Hash-Based Signatures?
Hash-based signatures have unique advantages:
- Security relies ONLY on hash function properties
- No mathematical structure for quantum algorithms to exploit
- Most conservative post-quantum approach
- Minimal cryptographic assumptions
SPHINCS+ Architecture
SPHINCS+ combines multiple hash-based constructions:
- WOTS+: One-time signature scheme
- XMSS: Merkle tree authentication
- FORS: Few-time signature for index selection
- Hypertree: Hierarchy of Merkle trees for efficiency
Parameter Options
| Variant | Security Level | Signature Size | Speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SPHINCS+-128s | NIST Level 1 | ~7 KB | Slower |
| SPHINCS+-128f | NIST Level 1 | ~17 KB | Faster |
| SPHINCS+-192s | NIST Level 3 | ~16 KB | Slower |
| SPHINCS+-256s | NIST Level 5 | ~29 KB | Slower |
How Signing Works
In the SynX quantum-resistant wallet:
- Transaction data is hashed
- FORS generates initial signature fragment
- WOTS+ signs the FORS public key
- Merkle authentication path proves validity
- Complete signature authorizes transaction
Stateless Operation
SPHINCS+ is stateless, meaning:
- No counter or state to maintain
- Same key can sign unlimited messages
- No risk of state desynchronization
- Simpler wallet implementation
Signature Size Trade-off
SPHINCS+ signatures are larger than ECDSA:
- ECDSA: 64 bytes
- SPHINCS+: 7-29 KB depending on parameters
- Trade-off: Larger size for quantum security
- Acceptable for blockchain transactions
Why SynX Chose SPHINCS+
The SynX quantum-resistant wallet selected SPHINCS+ because:
- Maximum confidence in quantum resistance
- Conservative security assumptions
- NIST standardization (FIPS 205)
- Stateless simplifies wallet design
Frequently Asked Questions
Do larger signatures slow transactions?
Signature verification is fast. Network handles larger data without significant delay.
Could SPHINCS+ be broken?
Would require breaking hash functions (SHA-256, etc.)—foundational to all cryptography.
Sign Transactions with Maximum Quantum Security
Explore SynX at https://synxcrypto.com